，十倍差价 佳能rf24-105 2.8 vs 佳能ef24-105 f4 腾龙28-105 f2.8，哪支rf套机镜头更适合你？ RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM 对比 RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM！ 首页

I say go for the 24-70 2.8. Check Canon’s refurbished site. They have regular sales too. It’s a better lens than the 24-105 by a good margin if we are talking later editions. You can also get an ef-RF converter. In my use I found the mirrorless frames worked very well with ef lenses.
我現在是用28-70 重量是可以習慣的. 但如是24-70 我一定會常想如果光圈能大一點就好了…. 而且你都考慮F2了 用24-70勢必還要帶一支35或50 實質上也是沒輕多少或便宜多少. 不用28-70真的不一定要選canon. 目前手上R鏡只有28-70 配 85/1.2. 如果要退一步 我應該會選24-105配
The Comparison: Canon vs Tamron. Canon’s EF 24-70 f/2.8L II USM has been hailed as the sharpest lens of its type, but it has no image-stabilization, and it carries a hefty price tag at $2049. On the other hand, Tamron’s new 24-70 f/2.8 VC USD does have image stabilization, but the company’s optics only occasionally match the standards
3. RF 24-105mm f4 L IS USM. The RF 50mm f1.2 and RF 85mm f1.2 would do the heavy lifting, while the RF 24-105mm f4 would give me some flexibility with focal length when necessary. Alternatively, I could remove the RF 24-105mm f4 (and perhaps the RF 50mm f1.2), and replace it with the RF 28-70mm f2 USM L.
The new RF 24-70 f/2.8L IS lens, as the last two let­ters of the mod­el name reveal, has a built-in opti­cal image sta­bi­liz­er, as does the RF 24-105 f/4L IS I test­ed here. On the oth­er hand, the EF ver­sion of the 24-70 f/2.8L II that I test­ed here does not fea­ture a built-in opti­cal image sta­bi­liz­er.
. 575 231 504 927 509 833 352 445

canon rf 24 105 f4 vs ef 24 70 f2 8